|
|
Post by ICPS-bob on May 24, 2007 4:05:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jm82792 on May 24, 2007 8:11:18 GMT
Is there a way to trigger on purpose or is that a thing that just happens every once i while it could be usefull to propgate plants.
|
|
|
|
Post by SilverKiento on May 24, 2007 16:55:45 GMT
Yeah I heard that you could propagate genlisea from their flower stalks but I never understood how... well now I do.  |
|
thwyman
Full Member
N=R* fs fp ne fl fi fc L
Posts: 133
|
Post by thwyman on May 25, 2007 11:52:53 GMT
Great pic Bob. Wish my camera were not at the repair center as I have a plant doing the same thing except the plantlet sent up its own flower stalk which has also gone viviparous. Really funky looking
|
|
|
|
Post by endodoc on May 25, 2007 17:52:50 GMT
In some orchids, like dendrobiums, phalaenopsis, and vandaceous types, small plants are called 'keiki' (Hawaiian for baby), these clones develop at the node of the inflorescence much like Bob has shown in his CP's;
Bob: do you think a 'keiki paste' (cytokinin) would allow us to clone CP's as is done with orchids??
Any thoughts??
regards
ed
|
|
|
|
Post by endodoc on May 25, 2007 18:52:03 GMT
Bob
I did a little (very little) additional research, what is the difference between 'keiki' formation and False vivipary (seems to be more common to CP's)
regards
ed
|
|
brian
Full Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by brian on Jul 9, 2007 18:04:52 GMT
And here I always thought it was a way for plants to re-pot themselves if they didn't like the soil
|
|
|
|
Post by BarryRice on Jul 10, 2007 19:01:27 GMT
Hey Guys,
I'm not sure this is a case of false vivipary. The term false vivipary is used to indicate a case where floral organs are replaced by plantlets, as we often see happening in Dionaea or some Drosera.
In the cool photos of Genlisea on this page, you can still see the flower bud, and it is not the source of the plantlet. I think the plantlet is coming out of the axil between the inflorescence main axis and the flower bud. I'm thinking that calling this an "adventitious plantlet" might be more appropriate?
|
|
|
|
Post by brokken on Jul 19, 2007 21:17:04 GMT
Hey Guys, I'm not sure this is a case of false vivipary. The term false vivipary is used to indicate a case where floral organs are replaced by plantlets, as we often see happening in Dionaea or some Drosera. In the cool photos of Genlisea on this page, you can still see the flower bud, and it is not the source of the plantlet. I think the plantlet is coming out of the axil between the inflorescence main axis and the flower bud. I'm thinking that calling this an "adventitious plantlet" might be more appropriate? It appeears that there is a term in use already: Adventitious embryony - No gametophyte develops. The embryo stems from cells of the diploid sporophyte like the integument, instead. It falls under the umbrella of vegetative apoximis. |
|
kath
Full Member
Posts: 79
|
Post by kath on Mar 23, 2008 6:21:17 GMT
How 'bout calling it 'baby plant that will hopefully grow'?
Nah...'spose it's not complex enough for us CP growers!
Really cool pic's though!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2008 15:42:13 GMT
So did we ever decide as to what it is called? Because my utricularia sandersonii has a now fully grown plant on a flower stalk..... there is just randomly this plant with leaves and runners coming off of it on this little tiny stalk in the air....lol
Should I remove it or let it grow in the air so that we can see the traps....it seems o be doing fine....I mist it though just in case....
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 27, 2008 19:24:40 GMT
It sound like quite a novelty. Any chance of a photo to add to the collection above?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2008 23:50:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2008 1:04:55 GMT
Sorry bout the pics my camera is not very good
|
|
|
|
Post by simran on Jan 16, 2011 0:26:38 GMT
The pictures taken by you are very good ans sharp..Sounds to be you have good pixel camera. This is first time, I saw some pictures of False vivipary. Thanks a lot.
|
|
